|
Title:
|
PROPOSAL, DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A STRATEGY FOR PREDICTING STUDENT PERFORMANCE ON THE TÔSABENDO PLATFORM |
|
Author(s):
|
Gabriel Catizani Faria Oliveira and Guilherme Tavares de Assis |
|
ISBN:
|
978-989-8704-62 |
|
Editors:
|
Paula Miranda and Pedro Isaías |
|
Year:
|
2024 |
|
Edition:
|
Single |
|
Keywords:
|
Prediction Strategy, Prediction Models, TôSabendo Platform, Student Performance |
|
Type:
|
Full |
|
First Page:
|
317 |
|
Last Page:
|
324 |
|
Language:
|
English |
|
Cover:
|
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload
|
|
Paper Abstract:
|
One of the potential applications of prediction models in education is in online learning. Considering online education, the
gamified platform TôSabendo ("now I know" in portuguese) was created based on quizzes (question and answer games)
with the aim of generating engaging experiences in Higher Education Institutions. The intention is to create a challenging
environment for the player, motivating them to learn the concepts presented in each question and giving them a sense of
progression in the task at hand. However, the platform currently lacks a prediction strategy using prediction models to help
teachers understand, through predicted knowledge, how a particular student may perform on the platform. This
understanding would be valuable for improving teaching methods and the content activities of classroom subjects, both in
the traditional classroom setting and on the TôSabendo platform itself. Therefore, the goal was to propose, develop, and
validate a strategy for predicting student performance on the TôSabendo platform. With the proposed and developed
prediction strategy, a practical experimentation was conducted involving different prediction models and fictitious datasets.
The evaluation initially assessed the model that would perform best with 10 different datasets, one for novice students and
another for veterans. Subsequently, the models that achieved the best results in this first experiment go through an
evaluation of different hyperparameters. Overall, after evaluating the models, decision trees yielded the most satisfactory
results for both novices and veterans. By further refining this model through training with different hyperparameters,
accuracy and precision results close to or equal to 100% were obtained, a value that must be analyzed and evaluated in the
future due to the need to create synthetic data, which suggests a possible overfitting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|