Digital Library

cab1

 
Title:      MIAV: AN INCLUSIVE METHOD FOR ACCESSIBILITY ASSESSMENT BY VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEOPLE
Author(s):      Gabriel de Almeida Souza Carneiro and Maria Alciléia Alves Rocha
ISBN:      978-989-8533-91-3
Editors:      Katherine Blashki and Yingcai Xiao
Year:      2019
Edition:      Single
Keywords:      Accessibility, eMAG, Usability, Visual Impairmentand WCAG
Type:      Full Paper
First Page:      57
Last Page:      64
Language:      English
Cover:      cover          
Full Contents:      click to dowload Download
Paper Abstract:      Today the Internet is the most popular source of information. Therefore, web content should suit both a general audience and visually-impaired individuals. Consequently, web software products should be assessed to fulfill accessibility standards. This paper introduces an inclusive method for accessibility assessment by visually-impaired users named MIAV. The MIAV enables visually-impaired users to assess the accessibility of web software without supervision. This proposed method complies with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the Brazilian e-Government Accessibility Model (eMAG), combining an automated approach with an approach grounded on the user experience and opinion of visually-impaired individuals. To design this method, we followed a sequence of steps. First, we carried out a pilot test to identify improvements to MIAV. Second, we had three visually-impaired students apply MIAV to assess IFFluminense’s portal’s, Q-Academico’s and Moodle’s accessibility. Finally, we ran AccessMonitor, an accessibility assessment tool advised by W3C, to evaluate the same web applications and obtained two indicators: average accessibility index and percentage of nonconformities by accessibility level. Results showed that none of the evaluated web pages met all the accessibility criteria. The resulting average accessibility index for Q-Academico, IFFluminense’s portal and Moodle were 4.3 and 5.6 and 6.8 respectively. In addition, the visually-impaired students identified several accessibility issues. Therefore, we suggest improvements for the assessed web applications to provide a better user experience for visually-impaired students.
   

Social Media Links

Search

Login