Digital Library

cab1

 
Title:      EXTRACTION OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTENTIONS OF ADVISING TO ACADEMIC PAPER AND ITS REVISION BASED ON ANALYSIS OF GAZE AND COMMENTS
Author(s):      Kodai Kobayashi, Hiroki Nakayama, Ryo Onuma, Hiroaki Kaminaga, Youzou Miyadera and Shoichi Nakamura
ISBN:      978-989-8704-62
Editors:      Paula Miranda and Pedro IsaĆ­as
Year:      2024
Edition:      Single
Keywords:      Paper Refining Support, Differences Between Correction and Revision Intention, Eye Gaze Movements, Refinement Circumstances, Information Visualization
Type:      Full
First Page:      151
Last Page:      157
Language:      English
Cover:      cover          
Full Contents:      click to dowload Download
Paper Abstract:      Careful revision is crucial in the process of writing an academic paper, however there is a limit to how much inexperienced students can improve papers on their own. Consequently, students generally ask professors to correct their papers and then implement revisions on the basis of the professors' remarks and comments. However, due to time constraints, professors are often unable to explain their intentions of the correction in detail, and the students therefore have an insufficient understanding of how to actually revise a paper from the suggested corrections. In this study, we propose a method for extracting the differences between correction and revision intentions based on an analysis of the gaze movements of professors and inexperienced students in academic paper refinements. We also develop a method for prioritizing which portions of the paper should be refined. Therefore, we aim to realize a novel method of supporting paper refinement that emphasizes the understanding of the improvement policy and its circumstances. This paper provides outlines of our two methods for estimating correction and revision intentions, a method for detecting differences between their intentions and overview of the support system that aims to implement these methods. Additionally, we describe the experiments we conducted to evaluate the estimation accuracies of correction and revision intentions and discuss the features of the proposed methods on the basis of the results.
   

Social Media Links

Search

Login